Five Names for Supreme Court Pending, Collegium Recommends Two More

0
5

The Supreme Court Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, Tuesday recommended Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Aravind Kumar — they are Chief Justices of the High Courts of Allahabad and Gujarat, respectively — for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court.

The resolution adopted by the Collegium said the court which has a sanctioned strength of 34 Judges is presently functioning with 27 Judges and “thus, there are seven clear vacancies” (File Photo)

The Collegium’s fresh recommendation comes even as the five previous recommendations for appointment as Supreme Court Judges are pending. On December 13 last year, the Collegium had recommended five names and the appointments are yet to be made.The Collegium’s fresh recommendation comes even as the five previous recommendations for appointment as Supreme Court Judges are pending. On December 13 last year, the Collegium had recommended five names and the appointments are yet to be made.The Collegium, also comprising Justices S K Kaul, K M Joseph, M R Shah, Ajay Rastogi and Sanjiv Khanna, gave detailed reasons for clearing the two new names.

It said “the resolution of the Collegium in regard to the appointment of Mr Justice Rajesh Bindal… Allahabad is unanimous. However, in regard to the appointment of Mr Justice Aravind Kumar, Chief Justice of the High Court of Gujarat, Justice K M Joseph has expressed his reservations on the ground that his name can be considered at a later stage”.

The resolution adopted by the Collegium said the court which has a sanctioned strength of 34 Judges is presently functioning with 27 Judges and “thus, there are seven clear vacancies”.pointed out that “on 13 December 2022, the Collegium recommended five names for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court, namely (i) Mr Justice Pankaj Mithal, (ii) Mr Justice Sanjay Karol, (iii) Mr Justice P V Sanjay Kumar, (iv) Mr Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, and (v) Mr Justice Manoj Misra. Their appointment is yet to be notified by the Government”.

The Collegium said it had resolved to recommend two more names for appointment as Judges of the Supreme Court against the two remaining vacancies.

It said that while evaluating the names, the “judgments authored by those falling in the zone of consideration for elevation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here